Adequate Yearly Progress
LanguagesA-Z IndexPrinter Friendly Image
Search
 

  ESEA

Adequate Yearly Progress

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is one of the cornerstones of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) signed into law January 2002 as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. In the state of Washington, it is primarily a measure of year-to-year student achievement on the state assessment in reading and mathematics.

A preliminary list of schools and districts identified for improvement is released by August 31. The final list is released by November 15.

2011: School List | District List
2010: School List | District List
2009: School List | District List

AYP Requirements

One of the requirements of NCLB is that states develop a baseline or starting point for students to achieve proficiency as measured by state assessment math and reading scores. Each year the state must “raise the bar” in gradual increments so that by 2013-2014, all (100%) students will achieve proficiency in each subject area. Science was added as an ESEA testing requirement in school year 2007-2008. It is likely that science will be included as a part of AYP calculations, but there is no timeline set for implementation. 

In addition to measuring academic achievement in reading and mathematics, NCLB requires an additional indicator of student performance be measured. For high school students the extended graduation rate must be used. For middle and elementary students it is the unexcused absence rate; see OSPI Bulletin 024-10 for guidance on reporting unexcused absences.

Each school and district must meet the yearly AYP goals as a whole and by disaggregated student population groups. These groups are specified by the law to be:

  • race/ethnicity;
  • students with disabilities;
  • limited English proficient students; and
  • students who are economically disadvantaged.

These groups must contain enough students to be statistically reliable and not permit personal identification of individual students. In Washington a group must contain at least 30 continuously enrolled students to be considered statistically reliable and at least 10 to protect personally identifiable information. To be considered “continuously enrolled” a student must be enrolled without a break in service from October 1 through the testing period.

AYP determinations must be made in all schools, even if they have fewer than 30 students in the “all students” group. A School Improvement Plan for Small Schools is required.

AYP applies to each school in the state that serves students in grades 4, 7, and 10. School totals for these grades are aggregated up to the district and state totals.

How is AYP determined?

What happens if AYP is not met?

What are the school consequences and when are they applied?


How is AYP determined?

AYP is calculated separately for reading and mathematics.

There are two ways a school can make AYP:

  • By demonstrating all students and required groupings meet or exceed the established state assessment proficiency goals in both mathematics and reading.
  • By meeting the “safe harbor” provision. This provision permits schools with one or more subgroups not making the goals to still make AYP if the percentage of students not making AYP in that school declined by at least 10 percent in each student category and the other indicator (graduation rate for high school or unexcused absences for elementary and middle schools) is met.


What happens if AYP is not met?

  • The law specifies consequences for schools and districts receiving Title I, Part A funds which do not meet the AYP targets for two or more years in a row. While the results of WASL testing are reported for all schools and districts, the consequences apply only to those schools receiving Title I, Part A funds.
  • After two consecutive years of not meeting AYP targets, a school enters Step 1 and is subject to the related consequences (see below). If AYP is met the next year the school or district stays at Step 1, if AYP is not met, it moves to Step 2. If AYP is met for two consecutive years, the school exits school improvement.


What are the school consequences and when are they applied?

Step 1—Schools not making AYP for two years:

  • Are identified for school improvement and must notify parents of their status;
  • Will receive technical assistance to improve performance and may be eligible to receive federal funds for school improvement activities;
  • Must develop or revise the school improvement plan not later than three months after being identified for improvement; must cover a two-year period;
  • Must offer parents the opportunity to transfer their student(s) (Public School Choice) to another public school within the district which has not been identified for school improvement, if one exists; and
  • Must pay for transportation if transfer is requested. They may use up to five percent of their Title I funds for this purpose, unless a lesser amount is needed. Under certain circumstances, districts may use an additional 10 percent of Title I funds, if necessary, to provide Public School Choice. If requests exceed the amount of Title I funds available for this purpose, priority is given to the lowest-achieving students from low-income families.

Step 2—Schools not making AYP for three years:

  • Are identified for their second year of school improvement and must notify parents of their status;
  • Must continue to offer Public School Choice as described above; and
  • Must offer parents the opportunity to request Supplemental Educational Services, such as tutoring, to low achieving students. View the list of OSPI-approved supplemental educational service providers. As with transportation above, districts use up to five percent of their Title I funds for Supplemental Educational Services, unless a lesser amount is needed. If needed, an additional ten percent of Title I funds may be used to cover the costs of Public School Choice, Supplemental Educational Services, or both. No more than 20 percent of Title I funds may be used for Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services.

Step 3—Schools not making AYP for four years:

  • Are identified for corrective action and must notify parents of their status;
  • Must continue to offer Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services as described earlier; and
  • Must select options from the following list:
    • Replace certain school staff;
    • Implement a new curriculum and provide additional professional development;
    • Significantly decrease management authority;
    • Appoint an outside expert to advise on school improvement plan;
    • Extend the school year or school day; or
    • Restructure the internal organization of the school.

Step 4—Schools not making AYP for five years:

  • Are identified for restructuring and must notify parents of their status;
  • Must continue to offer Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services as described above; and
  • Must begin planning for restructuring (see below).

Step 5—Schools not making AYP for six years:

  • Must implement restructuring; and
  • Must select options from the following list:
    • Replace all or most of relevant school staff;
    • Contract with outside entity to operate school;
    • If the state agrees, undergo a state takeover; or
    • Undertake any other major restructuring of school.

Additional Resources

AYP PowerPoint (PDF)

Proficiency Index Templates

AYP Questions and Answers

Calculating AYP - Updated November 2011 (Excel)

Appeals Process

Washington State Uniform Bar and Graduation Rate (Word)

Waiver Requests to the U.S. Department of Education

AYP Model Letters

U.S. Department of Education

Old Capitol Building, PO Box 47200, 600 Washington St. S.E., Olympia, WA  98504-7200  (360) 725-6000  TTY (360) 664-3631
Contact Us    |    A-Z Index    |    Site Info    |    Staff Only    |    Education Data System (EDS)