Press Releases - OSPI
LanguagesA-Z IndexPrinter Friendly Image

For media inquiries, please contact: 



   Twitter   Facebook    Email me Email


Dorn Asks Attorney General for Opinion on Use of Local Levies
Today, State Superintendent Randy Dorn sent a letter to Attorney General Bob Ferguson asking if school districts, under state law, are authorized to pay for salaries using local levies. Below is a statement from Dorn on the letter.

OLYMPIA — November 17, 2015 — Nearly 40 years ago, the state Supreme Court ruled that the state’s education funding system relied too much on local levies. That reliance, the Court said, was unconstitutional.

Nearly four years ago, the Court reaffirmed that opinion in McCleary v. Washington.

And yet, since then, I’ve heard few ideas about reforming the levy system.

With that in mind, I’ve asked Attorney General Bob Ferguson today to issue a formal opinion answering the following question:

Do school district board members have the authority to use local levies to pay compensation to district employees for basic education services?

The fact is that, every year, school districts levy local taxpayers to pay for administrative, support staff, and teacher salaries. To give one example: In Bethel the state pays an average of $60,000 for each administrative staff. But the district pays an average of $111,600.

Where does the $51,600 difference come from? Local levies.

The problem isn’t just with administrators. For certificated staff, the difference is $10,000; for classified, it’s $12,700.

That’s per employee.

And while the numbers are different for each of our state’s 295 districts, most must use local levies to pay for salaries.

I’m asking my question because the Supreme Court was not asked to address this issue directly in McCleary. The Court has ruled that the state must fully fund basic education, but they have not addressed the other side of the equation: Can local districts use levies to make up for what the state isn’t providing? I believe the answer is no. Levies are for enrichment, and can be funded by local taxpayers.

Basic education is a state responsibility. Districts don’t have the authority to use local levies to make up what the state chooses not to fund.

I hope Attorney General Ferguson can provide an answer before the holidays so that the Legislature can act accordingly, and so that districts can have clarity as they prepare future budgets and future levies. I hope the Attorney General agrees.


About OSPI
The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) is the primary agency charged with overseeing K–12 education in Washington state. Led by State School Superintendent Randy Dorn, OSPI works with the state’s 295 school districts and nine educational service districts to administer basic education programs and implement education reform on behalf of more than one million public school students.

OSPI provides equal access to all programs and services without discrimination based on sex, race, creed, religion, color, national origin, age, honorably discharged veteran or military status, sexual orientation, gender expression or identity, the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability. Questions and complaints of alleged discrimination should be directed to the Equity and Civil Rights Director at (360) 725-6162 or P.O. Box 47200, Olympia, WA 98504-7200.

Twitter | Facebook | Flickr

Kristen Jaudon
Communications Specialist
(360) 725-6032 |

Nathan Olson
Communications Manager
(360) 725-6015 |

The OSPI Communications Office serves as the central point of contact for local, regional and national media covering K-12 education issues.

Communications Manager
Nathan Olson
(360) 725-6015


   Updated 11/17/2015

Old Capitol Building, PO Box 47200, 600 Washington St. S.E., Olympia, WA  98504-7200  360-725-6000  TTY 360-664-3631
Contact Us    |    A-Z Index    |    Site Info    |    Staff Only    |    Education Data System (EDS)